One Call, That’s All 800-404-9000
CASE EVALUATIONS ARE FAST, EASY, AND FREE.
Lane splitting is the practice of motorcycles driving between lanes of traffic when the traffic is stopped. In Utah, as well as in other states, the legality and guidelines surrounding lane splitting significantly impact motorcyclists and other drivers.
Understanding these regulations is crucial for riders to navigate their rights and responsibilities on the road. For legal support or to discuss the specifics of motorcycle laws in Utah and other states, reaching out to a motorcycle accident lawyer is recommended.
In Utah, both lane filtering and lane splitting are distinct terms in their legal definitions and the circumstances under which they are permitted.
Although lane splitting is illegal in Utah, motorcyclists, when lane filtering, must ensure that the movement can be made safely without endangering themselves or other road users. This includes checking for sufficient space between vehicles, ensuring visibility to other drivers, and being prepared to stop if necessary.
The legality of lane splitting in other states that our firm serves is as follows.
Lane splitting in Idaho is not legally permitted. Motorcyclists are required to adhere to the same rules and regulations as other motor vehicle operators, which include using a designated lane.
Authorities in Idaho emphasize that lane splitting can increase the risk of accidents due to the close proximity of vehicles and the reduced space for maneuvering. This concern is supported by traffic safety experts who caution that lane splitting can lead to collisions if not practiced under very controlled conditions, which are difficult to maintain on public roads.
Like Idaho, lane splitting in Washington is also illegal. Washington state law stipulates that all vehicles must stay within a single lane, and moving between lanes of traffic is not permitted. This is outlined to prevent accidents and ensure that all road users can anticipate the movements of others reliably.
Both Idaho and Washington maintain these laws to prioritize safety and order on the roads. Motorcyclists are encouraged to participate in ongoing discussions and legislative sessions that may reconsider these laws, reflecting the dynamic nature of road safety regulations. Meanwhile, adhering to the current laws is essential for all riders in these states.
In California, lane splitting is legal, and there are few restrictions or guidelines. Motorcyclists are provided with relatively few restrictions or explicit guidelines regarding this maneuver. Officially recognized by the State of California, lane splitting allows motorcyclists to navigate between lanes of slow-moving or stationary traffic.
The State of California Department of Motor Vehicles simply warns that lane splitting motorcycles should:
In the California Office of Traffic Safety’s 2014 study, 60% of drivers disapproved of lane splitting. More than half of those who disapproved said it was because they felt lane splitting was unsafe.
On the other hand, lane splitting decreases traffic congestion. Supporters of lane-splitting argue it is safer for motorcyclists who can avoid being rear-ended by distracted drivers in stop-and-go traffic. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration explains that the practice is common in many other countries and is worthy of further study because it offers a means of reducing congestion in addition to possible safety benefits.
Lane splitting in Utah is a hot topic, especially given the state’s clear position that you can’t lane split in Utah. Yet, accidents related to this practice remain a concern, both for those who ride motorcycles and everyone else sharing the road.
Some of the most common ways lane splitting accidents occur include:.
The strict enforcement of Utah lane splitting laws exists for good reason. Lane splitting accidents can have severe consequences, and understanding how these incidents happen helps underscore why Utah prohibits the practice. When crashes do occur, the legal and physical repercussions are often significant for everyone involved.
The injuries resulting from lane splitting accidents can be particularly severe due to the exposed nature of motorcycles. Utah lane splitting laws are designed in part to reduce these risks, which can change a person’s life in an instant. Here are some of the most common injuries seen in accidents where lane splitting is involved.
Lane splitting injuries are often catastrophic, affecting not just the rider but their families and livelihoods. Utah’s decision to prohibit lane splitting aims to minimize these traumatic outcomes. Knowing the dangers associated with lane splitting in Utah is essential for every rider and motorist on the road.
Liability in lane splitting accidents is often a point of contention, especially in states with strict prohibitions like Utah.
Under Utah lane splitting laws, a rider who is found lane splitting at the time of an accident may be considered at fault or partially at fault, depending on the circumstances. However, Utah follows a comparative negligence system, which means that liability may be shared between the parties involved.
For example, if a motorcyclist is lane splitting illegally and is struck by a driver who was talking on the phone or driving recklessly, the court may assign a percentage of fault to both the rider and the driver. The rider’s ability to recover damages will depend on the degree of fault assigned. If the motorcyclist is found to be more than 50% at fault, Utah car accident law may bar them from recovering damages entirely.
Determining liability can be complex, particularly when insurance adjusters and opposing attorneys are involved. Insurance companies may attempt to deny or minimize claims by pointing out that you can’t lane split in Utah and arguing that the rider’s own illegal actions caused the crash. This is why it is crucial for injured parties – whether riders or drivers – to consult with accident attorneys familiar with lane splitting laws and personal injury claims in your state.
There are also instances where the fault may lie more heavily with the driver, such as when a motorist makes an abrupt lane change without signaling or fails to check blind spots. In these situations, even if the motorcyclist was lane splitting, the driver’s negligence can play a significant role in causing the accident. Every case is unique, and liability is determined based on the specific facts and available evidence.
One of the most important factors to consider after an accident, regardless of whether lane splitting was involved, is the statute of limitations for filing a personal injury claim. The statute of limitations is a legal deadline that restricts the amount of time an injured person has to file a lawsuit.
In Utah, the statute of limitations for most personal injury claims, including those arising from motorcycle accidents and violations of Utah lane splitting laws, is generally 4 years from the date of the accident. If a claim is not filed within this period, the injured party may lose their right to seek compensation.
It is important for accident victims to act quickly, as critical evidence can be lost over time, and delays may weaken a claim. Whether the accident occurred because a rider violated the law and lane split in Utah or was injured by another’s negligence, timely legal action is necessary to protect one’s rights.
Certain exceptions may apply, such as if the accident resulted in a wrongful death or involved a government entity, which can shorten the filing period. Therefore, consulting with an accident attorney who understands the intricacies of Utah lane splitting laws and the applicable statute of limitations is essential.
If you’ve been injured in a motorcycle accident in Utah or elsewhere caused by another driver, you deserve fair and full compensation. Oftentimes, insurance companies are quick to place unfair blame on the motorcyclist. At Craig Swapp & Associates, our experienced attorneys take pride in fighting for the rights of motorcyclists.
On your behalf, we’ll pursue fair compensation for:
Call us today at 1-866-316-5712 or fill out the contact form to set up a free consultation.
Written By: Ryan Swapp Legal Review By: Craig Swapp